Can we say « Indigenous people » ?
Welcome to “Can we say?”, a monthly column where URelles answers questions about inclusive language. Got a question for us? Write to info@urelles.com and we’ll get back to you. It’s all anonymous.
Want to start the conversation about inclusive language in your organization? URelles can help! Find out more about our training courses on various topics related to equity, diversity and inclusion.
****
When referring to Indigenous people, what is the right terminology to use? Finding the perfect answer to this question is complex.
There are over 50 indigenous nations in Canada, spread across more than 600 communities. So it’s hard to find a term that represents them all. Despite the variations that exist, here are a few general principles to help you grasp some of the subtleties!
Three distinct groups: First Nations, Métis and Inuit
To begin answering this question, it’s important to remember that there are three distinct groups of Indigenous peoples in Canada: First Nations, Métis and Inuit.
The term Métis refers to a set of cultures and ethnic identities specific to people of both Indigenous and European ancestry. It also refers to the Métis nation of western and northern Canada. In Quebec, there are no recognized Métis groups.
Arctic peoples are collectively known as Inuit, which means “the people” in the Inuktitut language.
If the term “First Nations” is used to designate Indigenous people, it should be noted that it does not include Inuit or Métis, who are distinct Indigenous peoples. “First Nations” therefore refers to the 10 other nations that exist in Quebec (as well as elsewhere in Canada):
- Abenaki
- Algonquin
- Atikamekw
- Cree
- Wendats
- Innu (Montagnais)
- Maliseet
- Micmacs
- Mohawks
- Naskapi
The First Nations
Among the 630 indigenous communities across Canada, there are more than 50 distinct nations, each with its own language. Members of these communities often define themselves as members of a specific nation or community within that nation. For example, a Nêhiyawak (Cree) person from the Prairies might prefer to be identified by his or her nation, rather than simply being grouped under the term “First Nations” or “Aboriginal”. Similarly, a Kanyen’kehà:ka (Mohawk) person from Akwesasne who is a member of the Bear clan might prefer to be identified with their specific community (clan).
Do you know the nation or community (clan) to which these people belong? Ideally, you should name them as precisely as possible.
“Indian”: a term from the past
When Christopher Columbus arrived in America in 1492, he used these terms to refer to the indigenous peoples, misled by the mistaken belief that he had reached the Indies. Although today’s communities are still officially referred to as “Indian reserves”, and the 1987 Constitution Act is still officially called the “Indian Act”, the term generally evokes a connotation of colonialism for many native people in Canada.
Yet misuse of the term remains widespread. Until recently, in 2018, history textbooks in Quebec still used the term “Amérindien-ne”. These have since been reprinted to change the word to “First Nations”.
It’s also worth noting that, unlike in English, the term “Indigenous” is rarely, if ever, used in French. Similarly, the term “ aborigène ” most often refers to the indigenous populations of Oceania (Australia, for example).
“Indigenous‘ or ’natives‘ people
The term “ Indigenous ” and ’natives‘ refers to the original peoples of North America and their descendants. It thus encompasses the three major aboriginal peoples of Canada mentioned above: the First Nations, the Inuit and the Métis.
Both are generic term that can be used, especially if we don’t know to which people or nation the person(s) we want to talk about belong.
On the other hand, one recommendation is to favor wording such as “ indigenous people ‘ rather than ’ the indigenous ‘. This emphasizes the identity of each person as an individual, rather than simply naming them by their affiliation. It reflects an attitude of respect towards their individuality, while acknowledging their cultural heritage.
The more precise, the better!
Ideally, when it’s possible to determine the Indigenous nation or community to which a person belongs, it’s best to use it. Nothing can replace the precision of calling someone by the name of their nation or community. If you don’t have this information and it’s possible to do so, just ask!
If you don’t know the person’s nation or community, but you do know which of the three major Indigenous peoples the person belongs to (First Nations, Inuit or Métis), then it’s best to use those terms.
Finally, in situations where you don’t know which nation or community the person belongs to, or which Indigenous people they belong to, then it’s more appropriate to use general terms such as “Indigenous person” or “native people”. However, be aware that this terminology can encompass a vast diversity of cultures, languages and traditions.
Do you enjoy inclusive language conversations? Want to create opportunities in your organization? We offer training on microaggressions, unconscious bias and inclusive writing! Contact us to arrange a session!
- Can we say « Indigenous people » ? - 27 August 2024